How Did Shell Get Off the Hook for These Spills?

However, the Dutch courts rejected the group’s claims against Royal Dutch Shell. According to judge Henk Wien, Nigerian law has it that “a parent company in principle is not obliged to prevent its subsidiaries from harming third parties abroad.” Thus, Royal Dutch Shell could not be tried for the oil damages, but rather Shell Nigeria would be faced with the plaintiffs’ claims.

While the burden fell from Royal Dutch Shell to Shell Nigeria, very little stuck, as Shell Nigeria was only sentenced to pay for damages in one of the five cases brought against Royal Dutch Shell.

The ruling has a significant impact for both the people living near Shell’s oil infrastructure in Nigeria and other countries, as well as for Shell and other multinationals. For Nigeria, which had over 200 oil spills in the Niger Delta last year, the ruling drastically limits the people’s ability to seek compensation in court. For Shell and multinational corporations — at least those based in the Netherlands — the case shows that they are somewhat protected from the actions of their subsidiaries abroad.

Don’t Miss: Is Coal Set to Burn Higher?

To contact the reporter on this story: staff.writers@wallstcheatsheet.com To contact the editor responsible for this story: editors@wallstcheatsheet.com

Premium Newsletters

Stock Investor Cheat Sheet

Stock Investor Cheat Sheet®

The ultimate Cheat Sheet for finding winning stock picks.
Learn More

Gold & Silver Newsletter

Gold & Silver

Don't miss one of the biggest bull markets in history! Covers Gold, Silver, Gold & Silver stocks, and miners.
Learn More

Commodities Premium Newsletter

Commodities Premium

There's always a bull market in some sector! Find the best opportunities in commodities.
Learn more

ETF Investing

ETF Investing

At last, a trading system that buys the right ETFs at the right time, time after time!
Learn more

Yahoo Finance, Harvard Business Review, Market Watch, The Wall St. Journal, Financial Times, CNN Money, Fox Business