Snowden, NSA ‘Ted Talk’ Showdown: Security vs Privacy
Edward Snowden, former NSA contractor, appeared in a March Ted Talk to discuss “how we take back the internet.” Speaking to the audience remotely, he discussed his decision to turn documents over to the press, and related some of what the documents were showing and what they meant. This includes the bulk metadata collection, and the demands on major technology companies to cooperate on data collection, including Google, Yahoo, and the like. He explained that while some went to court over the demands, the trial was a secret one, and lacked the chance an open public trial might have. One document, he says, “Tells us [that] more communications are being intercepted in America about Americans than there are in Russia about Russians.” He accused the chair of the intelligence committee of lack of oversight, and talked about the Washington Post article on thousands of violations from the NSA of privacy rules.
“This is not a left or right issue … Our basic freedoms — and when I say our, I don’t just mean Americans, I mean people around the world. It’s not a partisan issues. These are things that all people believe and it’s up to all of us to protect that. And for people who have seen and enjoyed a free and open internet, it’s up to use to preserve that liberty for the next generation to enjoy,” said Snowden. “We don’t have to give up our privacy to have good government. We don’t have to give up our liberty to have security.” At the time, Chris Anderson, curator of the talks, said that, “If the NSA wants to respond, please do.”
Apparently, they did. Richard Ledgett, the NSA deputy director, spoke as a Ted guest this month as well, video conferencing in to address many of the same issues. He spoke on other options that Snowden could have taken to address his concerns within classified channels, and said that he feels Snowden being labeled as a whistle blower hurts others who actually deserve the status. The claim made by the press and Snowden that no one was put at risk, he says, and that national security was not harmed were “categorically not true.” He explained that the release of information alerted adversaries such as drug traffickers, human traffickers, and others to vulnerabilities they might otherwise have not been privy to, and those American agents working against them, and our allies are put at greater risk.