Blade Runner Sequel Confirmed, Harrison Ford Not as Confirmed

| + More Articles
  • Like on Facebook
  • Share on Google+
  • Share on LinkedIn

blade runner rachel

Harrison Ford has been publicly offered a role in Blade Runner 2. (Ridley Scott’s Prometheus, a gorgeous but mind-numbingly needless and lifeless pseudo-prologue to Alien, made enough money to warrant a needless sequel to Blade Runner, apparently.) Scott, the director of the original 1982 cult classic turned bonafide classic film, was contacted in 2011 to do a very belated sequel to his film, which, in all honesty, doesn’t need a sequel. But Scott and Ford, who infamously clashed on set (though Scott allegedly clashed with virtually everyone on the set of Blade Runner), and who infamously disagreed over the film’s ambiguity, eventually mended their relationship, and both publicly agreed that they wanted to further explore the world of Blade Runner.

The original film depicts a dystopian future in which humans have engendered a new breed of humanoid robots, called Replicants, which look and sound exactly like humans. The Replicants develop personalities and a desire to live longer than their four-year lifespan, and a lot of them “run” from the corporation that made them. In comes Harrison Ford’s Rick Deckard, a Blade Runner who hunts down the escaped Replicants and “retires” them, usually by shooting them.

The film is best remembered for its stunning visuals. Blade Runner looks absolutely amazing, and it’s aged impeccably well. (Part of that is due to Scott’s tinkering and use of CGI as late as 2003, but the practical effects and use of miniatures are still gorgeous today, and help set the strange, dreamy atmosphere of a city at once tangible yet far off and ethereal, a world you can’t trust.) But the reason Blade Runner is a classic is the existential threads that hold together the noirish narrative.

It’s been debated, quite ardently, whether Rick Deckard is a Replicant or a human. Scott and Ford have offered differing opinions at different times, but Scott’s Final Cut, the only one on which the director had completely creative control (or “final cut,” in business terms), heavily insinuates that Deckard is, in fact, a Replicant. The question, according to the film’s makers, is what kind of Replicant he is.

More Articles About:

To contact the reporter on this story: staff.writers@wallstcheatsheet.com To contact the editor responsible for this story: editors@wallstcheatsheet.com

Yahoo Finance, Harvard Business Review, Market Watch, The Wall St. Journal, Financial Times, CNN Money, Fox Business