The Best Silver Equity to Own: Why You Need Silver Wheaton

  • Like on Facebook
  • Share on Google+
  • Share on LinkedIn
Source: Thinkstock

Source: Thinkstock

Silver Wheaton (NYSE:SLW) operates as a worldwide silver streaming company. I want to be clear that I believe it is the best silver equity play in the stock market. Silver streaming is basically a process by which the company purchases a mining firm’s silver production in order to distribute that silver in the market. SLW has contracts to purchase silver in bulk at prices well below market value, and then proceeds to sell the silver at a higher prices. The company has “multiple long-term silver purchase agreements and two long-term precious metal purchase agreements, whereby it acquires silver and gold production from companies located in Mexico, the United States, Greece, Sweden, Peru, Chile, Argentina, and Portugal.”

Silver Wheaton is the largest precious metals streaming company in the world. Based upon its current agreements, forecast 2014 annual attributable production is approximately 36 million silver equivalent ounces including 155,000 ounces of gold. By 2018, annual attributable production is anticipated to increase significantly to approximately 48 million silver equivalent ounces, including 250,000 ounces of gold. This growth is driven by the company’s portfolio of low-cost and long-life assets. The company is my most preferred way behind physical silver ownership to invest in silver. The company is incredibly profitable, and the stock should see strong capital gains and also pays a dividend for shareholders to wait for a rebound in gold prices.

The company is performing very well and its most recent quarter was phenomenal despite depressed gold and silver prices. Revenue was $165.4 million in the first-quarter of 2014, on silver equivalent sales of 8.1 million ounces (6.2 million ounces of silver and 30,100 ounces of gold.) This represents a 20 percent decrease from the $205.8 million of revenue generated in the first-quarter of 2013, due primarily to a 31 percent decrease in the average realized silver equivalent price ($20.38 in Q1 2014 compared to $29.72 in Q1 2013), partially offset by a 17 percent increase in the number of silver equivalent ounces sold.

Of course, costs matter, and they rose slightly but not insignificantly. Average cash costs in the first-quarter of 2014 were $4.57 per silver equivalent ounce as compared to $4.39 during the comparable period of 2013. This resulted in a cash operating margin of $15.81 per silver equivalent ounce, a reduction of 38 percent as compared to Q1 2013. The decrease in the cash operating margin was due to a 31 percent decrease in the silver equivalent price realized in Q1 2014 compared to Q1 2013. Cash costs rose year-over-year primarily due to an increase in gold sales (30,100 ounces in Q1 2014 compared to 16,900 ounces in Q1 2013) associated with Vale S.A.’s Sudbury and Salobo mines. The average cash cost per gold ounce was $381, or $6.06 per silver equivalent ounce.

More Articles About:

To contact the reporter on this story: staff.writers@wallstcheatsheet.com To contact the editor responsible for this story: editors@wallstcheatsheet.com

Yahoo Finance, Harvard Business Review, Market Watch, The Wall St. Journal, Financial Times, CNN Money, Fox Business