Pay Czar Ken Feinberg Addresses Thain and Bonuses at Goldman Sachs

By Damien Hoffman

Intuitive Surgical Hits $393!

The Hoffman Brothers called ISRG at $152 and it ran to $393 for a 158% gain! See what the Hoffman Bros recommend you buy NEXT.

This morning on Bloomberg TV, U.S. Special Master on Executive Compensation Kenneth Feinberg had some interesting comments on John Thain’s new package at CIT and bonuses at Goldman Sachs:



Here are the key highlights from the full interview on Bloomberg TV:

Feinberg on whether he was consulted about CIT Group and John Thain’s pay package:

“Not at all. CIT is not part of my mandatory jurisdiction.The good news is that these private companies – CIT, Goldman, JP Morgan etc – they seem to be following the prescriptions I’ve laid out for the companies within my jurisdiction: relatively modest, base cash salaries and any upside is in the form of stock, not cash, so that the total value of compensation of an individual is tied to the overall performance of the company over the long term. That is all very, very good. The problem remains the high total compensation which is very much in excess of what we’re doing at the Treasury in keeping total compensation much more modest.”

Feinberg on whether Goldman CEO Blankfein’s $9M compensation is excessive:

“Yes I think it is [in excess]. If you look at the 700 people that are under my mandatory jurisdiction I do not believe there is more than one or two in the total of 700 that are making that type of total compensation. On the other hand, clearly Goldman is following the prescriptions I’ve laid out. Mr. Lloyd Blankfein is getting a very low base cash salary. His total comp is again tied up in long term stock, the value of which cannot be determined or transferred for about five years. That is the type of compensation we’re looking for, where value is tied to the total performance of the company itself.”

Feinberg on what would be a more reasonable scenario for Blankfein’s pay:

“I can’t speak to the culture and what is going on inside these companies. They are not really part of my jurisdiction. I like the mix of stock and low cash. The overall compensation again points out the necessity of doing something with the total compensation. The administration has proposed various approaches, the Volcker approach, a bank fee approach – I cannot really get to the total compensation but I am pleased at the prescription and that we’re not talking about guaranteed cash, which is something that is prohibited to those companies that are under my watch.”

Feinberg on whether Goldman and CEO Blankfein consulted with him on pay:

“Yes, [we] had a number of conversations. What the Treasury has recommended in terms of structuring, and size, I would like to think we had some influence on what Mr. Lloyd Blankfein finally decided.”

Feinberg on what influence he may have had over Goldman:

“Clearly, low cash base_I think Mr. Blankfein is getting under $600,000-Mr. Lloyd Blankfein is getting under that amount. His entire bonus, no cash, long-term stock, they cannot be transferred for I think five years. So that his ultimate package value will be determined by Goldman’s ultimate success over the long haul.”

Feinberg on the nature of his conversations with Blankfein:

“You will have to ask Mr. Blankfein. It was not about the package, but really about how Goldman as an institution should approach base salaries and compensation over time. He clearly was concerned, wanted to abide by what Treasury is doing and largely I think he has succeeded in adopting the prescriptions.”

Feinberg on whether these compensation changes are permanent:

“We will have to see. The Deputy Secretary of the Treasury pointed out a few months ago that these steps the banks are taking voluntarily is constructive – a small step. Whether or not it will be permanent, whether or not over a long period of time these prescriptions will stay in place [remains to be seen]. I know that Secretary Geithner is also looking to corporate governance reform, shareholder rights, regulatory reform, this is one part of a larger menu of prescriptions.”

Do you think Feinberg has had an effect on CIT and Goldman Sachs? Let us know what you think in the comment section below …

More on this topic (What's this?)
Volcker Rule Gives Goldman Easy Choice
Charts of the Day — Goldman Sachs and Bank of Montreal
CIT and Getting Out Of This Mess
Read more on Wall Street Bonuses, CIT Group Inc, Goldman Sachs Group at Wikinvest


Sharing Is Cool

Looking for Profits? Wall St. Cheat Sheet Premium subscribers have been crushing the markets with winning stock picks and a professional navigator in the hot gold and silver sectors. Let our team of professionals give you their best investing and trading ideas:

Click here now for your FREE trial to any of our acclaimed newsletters

Learn More

  • Larry CPA
    Capitalism, the good bad and the ugly.

    Capitalism is an economic and social system in which capital, the non-labor factors of production (also known as the means of production), is privately owned; labor, goods and capital are traded in markets; and profits distributed to owners or invested in technologies and industries.

    The world without capitalism is: anarchy, monarchy, feudalism, or communism. In all the alternatives someone chooses for the individual.

    In the ten thousand years of human existence those who controlled the land, and as we created machinery the means of production, are the people who became wealthy. And we established a well-understood system of ownership and written enforceable title to it. The great irony is that the land or equipment will not produce the advantage. People do. So why is there no people system? Well there is, it is called slavery.

    For reasons not enumerated here slavery which worked for 9 thousand seven hundred and forty years was abandoned by most of the world. Well not really. We have found more subtle ownership of people. People become attached to objects that they are used to and which provides the necessities of life. They stay and do the work that is required of them. The feudal system literally bound “free” people to the land. What made it work is the lack of alternatives. With no education no one could understand alternatives even if they knew where it was. There was no way to get there because they owned nothing and everything in between was owned by someone else.

    America was created first in concept with revolutionary thinking. And then with the flood of virtual surfs who first indentured themselves and then populated the land. And land was given to some of those. This disruption in the lineage of entitlement created the greatest wealth known to mankind.

    Why, because the equation is not simply capital plus people. Ignorance trumps all benefits. The intelligent use of people and capital creates more wealth. Along with hard work, it is why one farmer grows hundred bushels and the other only 10 on the same acre side by side. Title is given to both farmers so that the intelligent use motivates both. The noble side of capitalism allows new people to have wealth and more importantly many more people to have wealth than any other system. Why because they make it, not that anyone can give it to them.

    The bad part of capitalism is that entitlement allows people to be controlled. The feudal system continues on much more sophisticated ways. Debt has been the substitute for slavery for long before written history. The misuse of debt is called usury and it entered the moral vocabulary long before the literal ownership of people was abolished. Early Christians originally denied any interest at all to discourage the misuse. Jews created jubilee to rectify the implicit wrong of debt or ownership that extended for too long a period of time. We have codified this thinking in bankruptcy. And it is not by accident that seven years was the limit for indentured servitude and is the time limit for bankruptcy.

    The ugly part of capitalism is monopoly. That is when one person returns to the virtual power of a king although within a narrow industry. It eliminates all the advantages of capitalism and obtains all the disadvantages. Extremely large corporations have those elements. And the self limiting nature of human’s who die does not apply to Corporations. And the self-limiting moral mandates have been systematically removed from law, especially over the last thirty years.

    The problem is that we rely on lawyers to protect us. They rely on the written contract that does not clearly establish an inherent abuse. The real standard should be the probabilities of outcome, measured by outcome. If the result is not desirable it should be stopped. And we already know the outcome is not desirable.

    We don’t need to establish principles; we know and understood them for thousands of years. We know the results and can measure them. We need to take action to interrupt the misuse of law that lead people to be indentured to servitude by debt.

    Start by breaking up Corporations that are large by merger. Deny enforcement of contracts that lead to compounding of obligation that make debt proportionately larger than intended and disproportionate to the value purchased. Limit the enforcement of serial debt for consumer products. Regulate interest and all other charges for the forbearance of money. Freedom of choice does not include taking undue advantage of those who make poor choices.

    The noble part of free choice is the creation value beyond what was formerly known. Creating more subtitle yet just as effective control of people leading them to poverty is what is being compensated for today in the form of bonuses to bankers. One well-known leader of the banking community, Marie Antoinette, was made famous for not understanding that fact.
blog comments powered by Disqus

This post was written by:

Damien Hoffman - who has written 849 posts on Wall St. Cheat Sheet.


Contact the author







Advert

Share Your Thoughts

Did you or will you take a vacation this summer?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...