Is The Comex The Next Madoff Disaster?

By Dave in Denver

Intuitive Surgical Hits $393!

The Hoffman Brothers called ISRG at $152 and it ran to $393 for a 158% gain! See what the Hoffman Bros recommend you buy NEXT.

This is a guest post by Dave at The Golden Truth.

Gold_Bars_Stacked_in_a_VaultTo start, wouldn’t it be ironic if now-famous hedge fund manager John Paulson, who made billions betting against the real estate using derivatives, gave most of those profits back if I’m right about GLD and GLD implodes like Enron?  Judging from Paulson’s investment activity in the gold market, he has entered his “horse” into a lucrative race, only his horse is crippled.  His stock picks are pathetic and his choice of using GLD as a proxy for physical gold speaks volumns about his lack of understanding of the precious metals market.  I will circle back around to this after I address the accelerating train wreck at the Comex.

My colleague “Jesse” of Jesse’s Cafe Americain has posted a must-read piece about how the Comex now permits gold/silver contracts to be settled using ETF’s, like GLD, IAU and SLV.  Those of us who have been watching the Comex for many years have wondered with bewilderment, albeit horrified amazement, as the Comex and its regulators have allowed the short positions controlled by the big banks like JPM and Goldman to build up way beyond the ability of the Comex to settle those contracts with gold and silver, should there come a time when those holding those contracts from the long side decide to stand for actual delivery. This is the definition of a Ponzi scheme.  Keep issuing paper claims and hoping that those claims either expire worthless or enough of the holders do not ask for actual settlement, which has been the case all along.  But what if….?

It has long been suspected that the reported inventory at the Comex is being fraudulently reported such that the Comex would be in trouble even if a portion of the contract longs were to stand for delivery.  Recently, there has been some unexplained inventory occurrences which lend credence to the fraud theory.  More recently, the Comex issued a regulatory change which would permit ETFs to be delivered to contract longs instead of the actual metal.   This quote from Jesse’s commentary sums up the situation nicely:

Comex is putting forward the offer of paper in the form of money or ETF positions very aggressively, and making it the much easier alternative. Delivery of physical gold from the Comex is no longer as straightforward or even as semi-convenient as it had been in the past. In fact, it is difficult, and one must be very persistent and wait long periods of time” Here is the link:  Exchange For Physical

I can attest from personal experience that the Comex has indeed made it very burdensome to stand for physical delivery.  We waited 7 weeks past “last delivery day” to receive delivery on one measely silver contract.  The person who manages our depository told us were lucky, that he has other clients waiting over 2 months for delivery.

The point here is, why would the Comex be doing this if they were not concerned about a “run on the bank” in which traders stand for delivery of more gold/silver than the Comex is able to produce?  The point of acquiring gold/silver on the Comex is that it enables the buyer to acquire a large quantity of gold/silver which meets specific size, weight and quality specifications at the spot price.  Why now offer paper instead?

My point here is that it is becoming more apparent on a daily basis that the Comex is yet another one of the many large Ponzi schemes operating in the United States financial system, some already busted and some yet to bust - many operating with the enablement of the U.S. Government.  It would seem that a bright light is now illuminating a reality that was once criticized as being pure conspiracy theory.

My next issue is with the idea of settling a Comex position with GLD.  I wrote a research piece last year, and several others have as well, based on a very close reading of the GLD prospectus, in which the validity of GLD’s actual physical gold holdings were questioned.  Without going into details, and at some point I’ll post my work, there is no possible way to force the Trustee, Sponsor and Custodian of GLD to verify and prove that they actually possess the gold they say they do.  In fact, GLD has been so openly criticized, and has so blatantly rejected calls to provide the market with an independent physical audit of its gold, that GLD’s Sponsor, the World Gold Council, and its Trustee, Bank of New York, should feel thoroughly embarrassed.  The same SEC that let Madoff off the hook for several years is the entity which blessed the GLD prospectus, to the utter horrification of those who understood how exposed to fraud GLD investors would be.

As you can see, the fact that Comex would allow contracts to be settled using GLD in lieu of physical gold is absurd.  Essentially, when you get long a Comex contract thinking you are buying into the ability to take delivery of a 100 oz. ounce bar of gold, you are in reality buying into a piece of paper which in all probability is not backed by that bar of gold.  Then, when the Comex asks you to take delivery of the equivalent amount of GLD, you are getting whacked with another piece of paper, which not only is most likely not backed by gold, but you need 100,000 shares of it in order to convert into gold (GLD gold is only redeemable in 100,000 share increments, roughly $11.7 million in GLD stock at today’s price).

Which brings me back to John Paulson, who made a big splash by announcing his new gold fund, in which he’s investing $250 million of his own money.  Paulson’s firm is the largest holder of GLD.  Ever since Paulson made his fortune shorting the housing/mortgage market, his investment ideas have been questionable (BAC, C, CGB).  His big mining stock positions are AU and KGC.  AU is currently sitting on an over 4 million ounce hedge position in gold.  If you look at its latest 10Q, the close to $600 million dollar loss it posted last quarter can be tied to this hedge – AU lost almost $600 million during a period of time when the price of gold was relentlessly going higher and its peers were recording huge profits.  This hedge will be very hard to close out without losing multiples of last quarter’s loss.  Paulson’s fund owns at least 12% of AU.  KGC has its own issues which make it an inferior large-cap gold mining stock investment.

Experienced gold market investors understand that the only true way to benefit from the attributes of investing in gold is to actually accumulate physical gold and silver and make sure it is held in your own custody or with a safekeeping custodian that is trustworthy.   GLD’s custodian, HSBC, is not only NOT trustworthy but is one of the larger gold leasing entities in the market.  GLD is okay to use as a means of indexing the rate of return on gold, but GLD is definitively not an investment in the actual metal.  Someone please ask David Einhorn of Greenlight Capital, and formerly the largest GLD shareholder, why he suddenly announced in July that he dumped his GLD shares and bought physical gold that his firm safekeeps.  Apparently Paulson is arrogant enough to not look into this matter.

Here’s the risk with GLD:  the instant that a very large investor attempts to convert his GLD shares into GLD gold, and GLD delays or defaults on this attempt, the price of GLD will plummet.  In other words, if myself and several others are correct about the true nature of GLD, it most likely leases out its physical gold holdings and uses derivatives with funds not used to buy actual gold – GLD could potentially collapse the same way as did Enron and Madoff.  Paulson’s massive investment in GLD would vaporize, the price of gold would do a moonshot and everyone holding and investing in the physical metal would have a good laugh.

And finally, to come full circle, an argument can be made that the Comex has turned into just another massive paper Ponzi scheme.  To make matters worse the CFTC, as regulator of the Comex, appears to be looking the other way while a few big banks violate position and trading rules in gold and silver that the CFTC strictly enforces in other commodities markets.  With all signs pointing toward the Ponzi scheme view of the Comex, and in the absence of the Comex itself or its regulator providing any explanations to the contrary, it would appear that the Comex could be headed for the same graveyard as Enron, Refco, Madoff, et. al.  And anyone considering investing large sums of money into GLD or with John Paulson’s new gold fund should make sure they engage in very thorough due diligence – the kind of due diligence that many of us have been doing over the 9 year duration of the precious metals bull market.

Readers who liked this also enjoyed these posts:

Gold is Only 0.7% of Global Managed Assets

Precious Metals Expert David Morgan Gives Targets for Gold

GLDSLVStocksPrecious Metals

More on this topic (What's this?)
How Low Will the GLD Go?
Gartman: Gold Can Go Parabolic
Gold Pulls Back – Get Me a Fainting Couch!
Read more on Commodities Exchange (COMEX), SPDR Gold Trust, Gold at Wikinvest


Sharing Is Cool

Looking for Profits? Wall St. Cheat Sheet Premium subscribers have been crushing the markets with winning stock picks and a professional navigator in the hot gold and silver sectors. Let our team of professionals give you their best investing and trading ideas:

Click here now for your FREE trial to any of our acclaimed newsletters

Learn More

  • Is anyone else counting the life boats on the Titanic? Having come from Enron, I certainly am. If a physical exchange were to occur, Dave you are absolutely right, there isn't enough physical inventory to meet the commitments. When will learn that if it is too good to be true - it probably is. The electronic trading age has clearly created an opprtunity to "oversell" - whether it is seats on plane or naked shortsellers - This is a disaster waiting to happen.
  • tgarfield
    The disaster awaiting gold is when GLD dumps 1000 tonnes of it as investors flock. They sold 16 last week. They started with about 40.
  • tgarfield
    Are you looking for this? It's on the web site.

    www.spdrgoldshares.com/media/GLD/file/Stockcoun...
  • Thanks!
  • CME Group
    The integrity of our markets is paramount at CME Group. The article above inaccurately characterizes the delivery process and confuses eligible components of privately negotiated EFP transactions with delivery obligations under the COMEX Gold Futures contract. A critical point for readers to understand is that an EFP is a mutually agreed upon transaction between two parties and involves the execution of a futures contract and a separate, but related, physical transaction. Under the terms of the Gold futures contract, market participants may demand physical delivery of gold which is held at an approved vault. Pursuant to Exchange Rules all deliverable Gold warrants are backed exclusively by physical gold and all approved vaults are independently audited on a yearly basis. In response to customer requests, gold-backed exchange-traded fund (ETF) shares may be used as the physical component of a privately negotiated EFP transaction, provided that all elements of a bona fide EFP pursuant to Exchange Rule 538 are satisfied. You can read the full market advisory notice at this link: http://www.cmegroup.com/tools-information/looku...
    More information on COMEX gold contracts is available at http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/metals/precious....
  • To the CME:

    I never said the CME "forces" delivery of GLD/IAU. The fact is that CME is "offering" GLD/IAU as an acceptable substitute for the delivery of physical gold. There are two big problems with this, one big, one HUGE.

    The "big" one is that technically, yes, if you believe that GLD really has physical gold backing its certs, then you NEED 100,000 shares to exchange those certs for actual gold. A little guy with 1 contract who takes GLD in lieu of a 100 oz. bar of gold is not really getting physical gold. Not only that, you have to meet certain other specifications.

    The "HUGE" one is that, prove to me, and everyone else who has publicly annihilated the GLD prospectus, that GLD really has the gold it claims to have. The CME references "audits." These are not independent physical audits of the actual bars. The "audits," as per the GLD prospectus and the annual accountant's letter, are nothing more than the auditor looking at the financial records provided by the Custodian and the Trustee. There have been several public appeals by highly respected analysts, including myself, challenging the Sponsor and Trustee of GLD to provide independently audited proof that the GLD custodian AND SUBCUSTODIANS have the gold they report to have. These appeals have been denied each and every time. Here is my research report, based on very careful and thorough reading of the GLD prospectus, and in consultation with a former SEC attorney, on GLD:

    http://truthingold.blogspot.com/2009/12/owning-...

    For the CME to say that using GLD/IAU qualifies as a bona fide EFP transaction is, in and of itself incorrect, inaccurate, and possibly fraudulent.

    Here is an open, public challenge to the CME: It has been alleged by many analysts, including myself - and I say this with full experience in suffering long delays in getting Comex gold and silver delivered via Comex contracts - that the Comex is fraudulently reporting its inventory. I would like for the CME to provide an independent physical audit of the Comex vaults, including assays. And this would be done by an auditor/assay firm not in any way connected to the CME.
  • Thanks! I will look into this. And talk with the article author.
  • Does Comex manage a portion of their gold position using there own futures contracts? Might be a dumb question but i always wonered if this was allowed.
  • Hey Don, as I said in the commentary, GLD is fine for short-term indexing and trading. It's definitively not a surrogate for investing in gold. More and more evidence is piling up on a daily basis which suggests that GLD to a large degree is leasing its gold inventory and using gold derivatives.

    I've made 373% over the 8 years I've held my original gold bullion buys. I expect another triple over the next 3-5 years. And my gains are tax-free, as your money goes "off the radar" when you buy bullion and sell it over Ebay, craigslist or to bullion dealers.
  • Don Andrews
    Very informative piece, Dave. I actually just sold my GLD position after making 15% in a little over a month. It was a great call by the Hoffman Brothers in their newsletter. Looks like they were right screaming caution at the $115-$120 range. Taking profits and protecting capital if essential in this game.
blog comments powered by Disqus

This post was written by:

Dave in Denver - who has written 3 posts on Wall St. Cheat Sheet.


Contact the author







Advert

Share Your Thoughts

Did you or will you take a vacation this summer?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...