Author Archives | Derek Hoffman

Exclusive: Media Legend Larry Kramer Says Media Business is in a Gutenberg Moment

Exclusive: Media Legend Larry Kramer Says Media Business is in a Gutenberg Moment

A lot of people theorize or blog about the future of media. However, a handful of people actually walk the walk. One such person is Larry Kramer.

Larry spent 20 years as a reporter and editor at the San Francisco Examiner, the Washington Post, and the Times of Trenton. However, during the tech boom in the 90s, Larry seized the opportunity to become a successful media entrepreneur when he founded MarketWatch and managed the company as Chairman and CEO.

After turning MarketWatch into an incredible success, Larry spent time as a senior adviser at venture-capital firm Polaris Venture Partners. He has recently started teaching at Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse and is putting the finishing touches on his new book C-Scape: Navigating the Future of Business– set for release by Harper Collins in early November.

Although Larry is on the Board of Wall St. Cheat Sheet, I thought it would be great to share some of his awesome insights with our audience. So, last week Larry and I sat down for a special chat about what Larry calls a “Gutenberg moment” in media, the incredible breakneck speed of change in media, and some of the key variables to watch if you plan to stay ahead of the curve …

Derek:  Larry, you are currently teaching at Syracuse.  What do you tell your students when they want the ingredients for success in today’s media business environment?

Larry:  First, you must be incredibly open minded about the form factor of delivering media.  You have to watch closely because everything is changing.

We’re in what I call a “Gutenberg moment.”  This means everything is changing in dramatic fashion.  The whole story telling process is changing.  We’re creating an entirely new platform on which you can use video, audio, text, interactive graphics, and more in a single media which is very ill formed and just forming.

The habits of content consumers — news consumers, information consumers, entertainment consumers — are totally up in the air.  So is how much they watch at home, how much they watch in movie theaters, and how much they watch on portable devices.  When the iPhone came out it increased usage of the web on all phones by thirty percent. Now imagine what’s going to happen when the iPad comes out.

So don’t make your bets based on what people are doing right now.  Pay attention to consumer behavior. Look at how people consume your content.  Try to be proactive in how you design content for them … then see what works.

For example, play around with different things.  It’s really an open and interesting time.  The hardest thing to do is to understand which themes resonate. The things that stay the same are issues of journalism — fairness and news gathering.  But then there’s this whole new set of rules that are forming and you must pay attention to those while understanding they could keep changing.

If you want to be successful, learn two things: journalism and entrepreneurism.  That’s what I’m teaching.  I’m teaching a mix of management and journalism at Syracuse because I think you need both.  The percentage of journalism or media students who go into startups is getting higher.  Part of the reason is there aren’t jobs at the traditional companies.  There’s no reason that a start up can’t be competitive with any media company when the forum of media is changing so quickly.

Derek:  That raises an interesting point about quality and quantity. In today’s world, anyone can put up a blog, write, and publish in the journalism world.  How does someone become a legitimate journalist on the Internet?

Larry:  It’s very hard.  This is one of the roles that I’ve been trying to teach and is growing in journalism: curation.  Meaning, it’s not just about what news you cover and what you publish, it’s also about helping your audience choose from all the information that’s out there.  If there are ten thousand bloggers, you’re not going to read ten thousand blogs.  So, you’re looking for help to decide which ones you should read and which ones are legitimate.

In journalism we have a very strong task which is to train and teach people the difference between a journalist and a person who posts information.  Under what criteria does a journalist operate?  What’s different between those worlds?

The hard part is to get the journalist to understand it doesn’t mean you’re better — it just means you’re different.  A blogger’s audience wants bloggers because frequently bloggers have great insight.  Bloggers are not generally operating under the journalistic umbrella where they have to be fair or look at the things journalists look at before they publish.

For example, there’s a lot of things going into consideration before you just give somebody the pages of the New York Times.  However, a blogger has no such restrictions.  So, a blogger can operate a blog lots of ways.  You can simply be interesting or there are some who try to become more journalistic.  Ultimately, if they get really good, they’re usually swallowed up by media companies who will pay them a lot of money.

So, I think journalism will survive and prosper, but it’s fairly different than years past.  For instance, in the old days you wrote a story as a journalist and that was it.  You wrote it, it got published.  Now, that’s only the beginning of the process.  When you write something it gets published, then the reactions start and you’re suddenly being gauged by people who have something to say about your story.  They might even change your mind about it.  Regardless, readers who comment expect you’ll pay attention and react.

I think journalism is a high calling.  You must have a deep rooted desire to change the world — especially while we figure out how to fund it.  We are still figuring out how to build new ad models and charge people for certain content.  A lot of people aren’t optimistic we will find a sustainable business model for journalism, but I am very optimistic.

Derek:  Can you talk a bit more about the business model shifting?

Larry:  Sure.  We pay for content now, but people don’t realize it.  If you have cable TV, you’re paying for Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, and ESPN even though you don’t have a line item on your bill.  People might want more control over where that money goes — and that’s part of the consumer taking more power — but they certainly understand they have to pay for things.  So, if we build similar kinds of models around the other platforms, we’ll be fine.

Derek:  Larry, in your new book you talk about how media is in a “tailspin.”  How would you rate the pace of change we’re experiencing today versus when you started your career?

Larry:  There’s no comparison.  It is so accelerated right now, it’s almost frightening.  I’m really serious about this whole Gutenberg moment.  I really think we’re not even at first base for what form we’re going to be using for some of the devices that are already coming.

When people have the iPad, they’re going to have expectations about how journalists tell the story.  For example, if we were telling readers that very moment about the Berlin Wall falling, the reader will want to see video of Kennedy’s speech or the wall falling at the very time we’re telling them about it.

If we’re telling them about a hot new car, they want to see the car, they want interactive graphics about the car. Basically, readers want things they would have never expected a couple years ago because now they are available.

What’s interesting to me is we’re in this era of a rapidly changing technology that allows us to be so much better at story telling — so much more efficient — and we don’t yet have a generation of story tellers who know this medium.  So, the technology is kind of ahead of us right now.  It behooves us in the journalism world to get our heads around it and start helping consumers understand how they can use it.

However, we’re nervous to do that because it’s changing so fast and so furiously.  We start training to use one thing and then it’s, “Oh no … we don’t use that anymore.  That’s old stuff.

It’s also hard to teach.  So, one of the things I’m doing at Syracuse is bringing the case method to journalism because books are outmoded already.  This is a Harvard Business School method of teaching.  The books about journalism and the problems of journalism can’t be written fast enough.

This spring I’m bringing some students down and embedding them in three or four companies here in New York City.  I’m having them deal with the issues companies are really dealing with right now because they’re so unique.  They’ve never had anything like this happen.  It’s a great experience for students.

Derek:  Which begs the next question: what does the future look like for content publishers?

Larry: Good question.  Again I’m optimistic.  In my book C-Scape, I peg the shift that’s occurring in all media businesses and in all businesses to four different factors that will start with C: the consumer, curation, content, and convergence.  We already discussed the first two.  The next one is content.

In a world where buyers and sellers are getting maxed and middlemen are getting squeezed, the distribution model of television starts to fall apart.  The people who still make money are those who own the content no matter how it’s distributed.

That’s why Comcast (CMCSA) is spending a fortune to buy NBC (GE).  Comcast once had a great business because you had to use them or you didn’t get cable TV.  Well that’s not true anymore.  Now you can get a satellite dish.  Soon you will get all those shows on the web.

The future is ownership of the content.  So, the media companies which concentrate on good content will do well.  It’s going to be painful as their business models change, but they will change and survive because people will still want good content.

On the other hand, if good content starts to disappear because people refuse to pay for it, then people will step up and pay because at the end of the day they want it.  We just have to give them easy ways to pay.

Derek:  So content is still King?

Larry:  Absolutely.  More so now than ever. What’s happened is we’ve made content very accessible by removing several of the barriers — so everybody wants it.  Now we know more content exists regarding something that interests us.  For example, if you’re a Cleveland’s sports fan and you live in Florida, there are thirty places you can go to find out about last night’s Cleveland Cavaliers game and Lebron’s performance.  You might even be able to watch it for free on the web.

The bad news is this phenomenon messes with the existing business models where all the money was made from the network TV and then spread out here and there.  But the good news is that more people will have access to the content.  If they want it, they’ll be able to see it at whatever price offsets the costs.

Derek:  How do all the new devices play into the tailspin?  The 90s saw an emergence of desktops and Walkmans.  The 2000s saw the emergence of laptops, iPods, and flat screens.  What do you think will be the big trend of the next decade?

Larry:  Mobility.  The ability to simplify the process of seeing content while traveling and seeing it in a better way.  Everybody will have some form of tablet like the iPad.  Consumers will access all information wherever they are no matter what they are doing.

Every other device will still exist.  There will still be phones and desktops.  In fact, most people will engage content on multiple platforms — and hopefully we’re going to be able to simplify that by charging them according to this usage.  For instance, if you pay for HBO, you get it wherever you need it that day.

Derek:  How does advertising work in this new environment?

Larry:  The advertising models are going to get better on the web over the course of the year. Advertisers will get better at controlling their platforms.  Advertisers will target users better, give people choices of ads to watch, and do all kinds of things they never could do.  So the ad models will get better because you’ll be able to charge more for the ads that you run and therefore run fewer ads.

Derek:  And what do you think of the entrance of Google (GOOG) into the phone market?

Larry:  Huge. I think it’s going to be a monster. Since I use gmail, my contacts and everything are now in the cloud. I could definitely see using a Droid phone because of that. They’re making the best applications to take their own tools to mobile.

Derek:  Ultimately, do you think mobile phones and the innovation of these devices will compete with the iPad?

Larry:  If the iPad remains a hard encased device that’s large and the size of a big book, or at least the footprint of a big book, then it’s not going replace phones. It is portable in how the technology works, but it’s not really truly portable if you’re just running around on your own.  You can’t put it in your pocket. 

Now that may change. I think the idea that you might just have a phone on you which will allow you to do everything is probably true.  You now have one single device that covers you but it isn’t going to be the best way to do a lot of things including reading documents. So how quickly people have uses for a second device and have that all fit in is going to be important. I just don’t think everybody wants one device that does everything.

Derek:  Do you think in your personal opinion the U.S. economy is currently undergoing a recovery?  Do you think that the U.S. economy has reached a recovery point?  Or do you think there’s still a lot that needs to be worked out in today’s business environment?

Larry:  Well, I think they’re both true.  Yeah we are seeing a recovery and I think the market place for ideas is high.  We’re seeing lots of cool new stuff again.  New technology is popping up.  We’re seeing a lot of pretty interesting technology that has heated up and that’s great.

But, American industry has chosen the moment where we’re so scared of everything that’s happened, American companies haven’t really started hiring again.  So, productivity is monstrous because as things are getting better, companies are doing it, but they’re not hiring people to do it.  There will be a moment in time when we hit the exhausted button and we can’t do anymore.

For now, we are getting a lot more out of people and maybe just because they’re scared about losing their jobs.  Until a lot more people come back to work it’s going to keep things slow, which is unfortunate.  So it’s like a mismatch between the era of ideas and who can use them. But, it is a cool time and in my world, in the media world particularly, it’s a driving time of change. Like I said before, I think it’s a Gutenberg moment.  I think it’s so big it changes the world.

Derek:  Do you think newspapers or books will become extinct in this coming decade as tangible sales are declining?

Larry:  No, I don’t think so.  I think there will continue to be more elite products.  Books are going to be the railroads of this generation.  If the railroad had stopped and their business is moving people from here to there, railroad companies would have been in the car and airline business too.  Instead, they were in the railroad business.  So, if you’re in the book business you’re in trouble.  If you’re in the ideas business, you’ve got a shot here.

Derek:  Speaking of books, can you share some more details with us about your upcoming book?

Larry:  The working title is called C-Scape. It basically started as a book about the media industry business models being in chaos because of all these new digital platforms, new forms of digital story telling, and how it’s going to change. It is changing the media industry, but more importantly it’s going to extend into every business. 

Increasingly, all businesses must become more like media businesses because of how they have to deal with their constituencies, how they have to tell the story of their products, and how they have to basically get much closer to their consumers. This means listening much more because the consumer has so much more power.

I’m taking those four things I mentioned — content, the consumer, curation and convergence — and detailing how each of those words represent a fundamental piece of change that’s occurring.  I’m showing how they’ve changed the media industry, but also how they’re impacting lots of other industries.  And, some of those industries are already doing some really cool things to insure their survival … and others may not be.  So in the book I exmplain who they are, what to look for, and some thoughts on what it’s going to be like in a few years.

Derek:  Do you have an expected release date for your upcoming book?

Larry:  The Fall of 2010.

Derek:  Thank you for your time, Larry. I hope to speak with you again when the
book is released.

Larry:  Thanks, Derek. Continue to keep up the great work!

This was less than half of my interview with Larry. If you are interested in how Larry started in his early career, the story of MarketWatch during the tech boom, Larry’s thoughts on other technology, and more, simply join the list for our upcoming book “Inside the Brightest Minds on Wall Street” …

Our upcoming book will feature interviews with stars such as Jim Rogers, Dylan Ratigan, John Mauldin, Dr. Brett Steenbarger, Todd Harrison, and many more. To make a free reservation for your copy from our first printing, simply join our V.I.P. list below:


 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)




Posted in Brightest Minds, Buzz, Featured, Features, Interviews, The Knowledge2 Comments

Carl Icahn’s 6 Biggest Busts … Is Genzyme Next?

Carl Icahn’s 6 Biggest Busts … Is Genzyme Next?

The Trading Edge with Derek HoffmanOn February 22nd, Genzyme (GENZ) said Carl Icahn will nominate 4 directors, including himself, to Genzyme’s board of directors. The election is slated to take place at the annual meeting on May 20th.

The Genzyme news is an opportune time to take notice of some of Icahn’s recent botched investments. We uncovered a lot of shareholders dumped in the mud while trying to piggy-back Icahn’s investments. Here are six Icahn flops that I could find for you after a round of stock sifting:

1) WCI Communities (former ticker: WCI)



On January 16, 2007, a Securities and Exchange Commission filing disclosed that Icahn was the beneficial owner of 14.57%, or 6.1 million shares, of WCI Communities Inc. In the filing, Icahn indicated he intended to contact WCI to discuss how to “unlock the inherent value” of its shares. Icahn served as chairman for the homebuilder. Icahn paid an average $18.46 a share — about $112.6 million — for his stake in WCI. Icahn’s shares of WCI stock are worthless today since WCI filed for bankruptcy and no longer trades on the NYSE under the ticker WCI.

2) Motorola (MOT)



On January 30, 2007, Motorola (NYSE: MOT) received notice that Icahn owned about 33.5 million shares — at the time representing a 1.39% interest in the company. Again, Icahn pushed for a seat on the board. The stock price was around $19 per share. But he was turned down by the majority of the stock holders in an election for Board of Directors. On March 24, 2008, Icahn sued Motorola as part of his efforts to gain 4 seats on Motorola’s Board and force a sale of its mobile business. Today, shares of MOT are fetching $7 per share.

3) Blockbuster Inc (BBI): “Wow! What a difference (Icahn makes)!



In 2005, Carl Icahn began his investment stake in Blockbuster (BBI) and securing representation on the company’s board. Icahn spent roughly $320 million on his stake at a time when BBI was over $10 per share. Icahn has been snowboarding downhill with BBI’s shares ever since he became an “activist” investor in the company. Today, Blockbuster shares are trading at $.41 per share. I guess his activism has been to destroy value.

4) Time Warner (TWX)



In 2006, Carl Icahn controlled 3% of the Time Warner (TWX) and waged a quixotic campaign to split the company into 4 separate units.
But he didn’t get anywhere close. Instead, he only convinced management to increase share repurchases — even that was a horrible move. Shares were trading at about 45 when that was announced. Today, TWX shares trade at $30.50 per share.

4) Telik (TELK)



In early 2007, Carl Icahn owned over 5 million shares in biotech company, Telik (TELK). He purchased shares between $7 and $17 per share. By early 2009, Icahn sold his stake in Telik for under $1 per share.

5) Greenbrier Companies (GBX)



In early 2008, Carl Icahn acquired an approximate 10% stake in railroad freight car company Greenbrier Companies (GBX). At the time of Icahn’s share acquisition, shares of GBX were over $20. Icahn had the vision to hopefully merge GBX with another one of his heavily owned companies, American Railcar (ARII). However, his vision remained nothing but a vision. His vision flopped, and today Greenbrier is trading at appoximately $10 per share.

6) Guaranty Financial (former ticker: GFG)



In January 2008, Carl Icahn owned roughly 10% of the Texas-based financing group. The stock was trading over $12 per share. Icahn pressured its former parent, Temple-Inland (TIN), to spin off the financial group. The bullied action resulted in Guaranty finally declaring bankruptcy in the summer of 2009.

Relative Success



Two deals exhibiting Icahn’s corporate raider success include Eli Lilly’s (LLY) acquisition of ImClone and Anadarko’s (APC) acquisition of Kerr-McGee.

As you can see and conclude, the road bumps in Icahn’s track record are not so friendly to the Billionaire’s fellow shareholders. Would you rather invest with Warren Buffett or Carl Icahn? I would opt for the more shareholder friendly of the two and steer clear of Genzyme (GENZ) right now. Another disaster might be brewing with Icahn.

Disclosure: No positions in the companies mentioned.

To get entry points, stop-loss points, and profit targets for our fresh March watch list stocks and Featured Trade, simply try a 14-day complimentary trial to Wall St. Cheat Sheet Premium by visiting here:

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/newsletter/

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)




Posted in Buzz, Featured, Most Popular, The Edge, The Trade6 Comments

The Top 10 Reasons CBS is Back for March Madness

The Top 10 Reasons CBS is Back for March Madness

The Trading Edge with Derek HoffmanSunday is the NCAA tournament bracket selection show on CBS (ticker: CBS). So, with March Madness in the air, I thought I would take a page out of David Letterman’s book and highlight a CBS Top Ten for you:

10) CBS owns the rights to March Madnes. CBS has a $6 Billion, 11-year rights deal with the NCAA for the Tourney, with 3 years and $2.1 Billion remaining. CBS pays the NCAA a licensing fee of roughly $610 million.

9) New mobile products for the NCAA March Madness Championship are rolling out so you can have the tourney at your fingertips.

8) Leno’s return to late night television was too late! David Letterman’s ‘Late Show’ earned $271 Million Ad Dollars in ‘09 vs. ‘The Tonight Show’ earning $175.9 Million Ad Dollars in ‘09.

7) According to Ad Age, from Sept. 21st ‘09 to Feb. 14th ‘10, Letterman’s audience was 4.2 million viewers vs. ‘The Tonight Show’ total audience of 2.92 million viewers during a longer period from June 1st ‘09 to Jan 24th ‘10.

6) CBS’s total advertising revenues tied to the tourney are roughly $600 million — third to just the World Series and the Super Bowl.

5) According to WPP-owned Kantar Media, CBS’s online March Madness revenue totaled 5% of the overall $600 million plus ad revenue pie last year, up from 3.5% the year before and expected to edge even higher this year.

4) Fun fact: office pool betting tallied across the U.S. reaches over $3 billion for the NCAA tournament this year, with the online CBS tourney brackets being utilized the most of any online options.

3) Tiger Woods is planning his return to Golf later this month in preparation for the 2nd most-watched sports event of the year, the Masters, aired by CBS in April.

2) Insider Sumner Redstone owns over a half million shares of stock in CBS, now more shares than Viacom (ticker: VIA-B) (see my other Haute Investing Article). link to this http://www.hauteliving.com/blog/viacom-kicks-off-the-new-decade-with-viable-strength/

1) CBS’s stock is up 375% from its March ‘09 low a year ago.

In the words of Dickie V, CBS and March Madness are “awesome baby!”

Disclosure: No positions in the companies mentioned.

To get entry points, stop-loss points, and profit targets for our fresh March watch list stocks and Featured Trade, simply try a 14-day complimentary trial to Wall St. Cheat Sheet Premium by visiting here:

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/newsletter/

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)




Posted in Buzz, Featured, The Edge, The Trade0 Comments

August ‘09 Featured Trade Systemax Hits our First Profit Target

August ‘09 Featured Trade Systemax Hits our First Profit Target

Yesterday, our Premium service Featured Trade from August 2009, Systemax (SYX), delivered a phenomenal quarterly earnings report after-the-bell. Systemax reported Q4 EPS of $.46 vs a $.33 analyst consensus. Moreover, revenue grew 15% year-over-year and the tech retailer delivered record quarter and annual sales. The pick hit the first profit target after-hours yesterday, and there are two more targets ahead.

If you are looking for swing trading ideas which include profit targets and stop-loss points, click here to get a free copy of our new and improved Premium service. Our service is a major bargain for what you receive, and the results speak for themselves:

Complete List of Wall St. Cheat Sheet Premium Picks (since inception Nov. 2008)

Closed Feature Trades

12/2008 Mosaic (MOS) = 82.14%

12/2008 Simon Property Group (SPG) = 44.44%

5/2009 Google (GOOG) = 9.75%

10/2009 Gold ETF (GLD) = 15%

12/2009 Google = 3.33%

Open Feature Trades

5/2009 Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) = 133.55%

8/2009 Systemax (SYX) = 49.6% at First Profit Target

1/2010 Pet Meds Express (PETS) = 5.6% at First Profit Target & 10.8% overall

2/2010 Western Digital Corp. (WDC) = (2%)

3/2010 = Just released … Click here to receive a complimentary issue of our Premium service for free.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)




Posted in Featured, The Edge, The Trade0 Comments

3 Pioneers in the Movie Rental Business

3 Pioneers in the Movie Rental Business

The Trading Edge with Derek HoffmanCoinstar (ticker: CSTR) is fast-becoming an emerging momentum play. The company is approaching a $1 billion enterprise due to their red hot Redbox located at the front of every grocery store all over the country.

Redbox dishes out DVD rentals for only a $1 with plenty of feature titles licensed from Paramount Home Entertainment, a division of Viacom (see: http://www.hauteliving.com/blog/viacom-kicks-off-the-new-decade-with-viable-strength/). Gary Cohen, SVP of Redbox, said, “From road warriors to moms on the run, the iPhone app from Redbox helps customers rent and reserve at any of the thousands of neighborhood locations nationwide.”

Recently, the iPhone app from Redbox surpassed 1 million downloads. Keep a close eye on Coinstar as they steal more business from Blockbuster.

Meanwhile, Netflix (ticker: NFLX) has a market cap over 3 times that of Coinstar. Founder and CEO Reed Hastings possesses the key leadership quality of adaptability — a quality he must have learned while serving in the Peace Corps in his younger days.

His company’s stock has doubled over the past year and grown to serve over 12 million subscribers. Analysts forecast Netflix to double their subscriber base by 2016. A key catalyst is their continuing investment in streaming online movies, ultimately the customer’s next destination for viewership.

On the flip side, Blockbuster (ticker: BBI) was just too late to the online game. The company is now a penny stock! Blockbuster is like an old-fashioned travel agency in the early 90s that didn’t see the Internet boom coming. Eventually, the old-fashioned, traditional travel agencies were run over by online travel agencies like Expedia, Orbitz and Yahoo! Travel. Lesson learned by Blockbuster: adapt to change, otherwise get left behind.

Lastly, keep your eye on TiVo (ticker: TIVO). This week, TiVo announced they are ready to release new DVRs this spring. Unlike the current models, critics are calling the new device a solution to integrating TV and Internet content.

The TiVo Premiere is the answer to the company’s urgency to spark the growth of its stagnant 1.5 million customer base. Price could be an issue, as the new DVRs will range from $299-$499 in addition to required subscription fees ranging from $12.95 a month to $299 for three years.

TiVo CEO Tom Rogers said, “We’re moving toward get anything you want whenever you want it.” A search for Penelope Cruz on the new TiVo DVRs would bring up her movies that are showing soon on TV, available for rental or purchase through Amazon.com (ticker: AMZN), as well as related YouTube videos. Sounds like a convenient one-stop shop library for those willing to pay.

Furthermore, TiVo just won an intellectual property case worth $300 million against EchoStar Communications Corp. (ticker: SATS) the parent company of Dish Network Corp. (ticker: DISH). The win means companies like Comcast Corp. (ticker: CMCSA) and DirecTV (ticker: DTV) must enter into commercial arrangements with TiVo which will yield future licensing fees.

Three new pioneering options are unfolding before our eyes. Which one will you integrate into your experience? Your answer may lead to a great investment.

Disclosure: No positions in the companies mentioned.

To get entry points, stop-loss points, and profit targets for our fresh March watch list stocks and Featured Trade, simply try a 14-day complimentary trial to Wall St. Cheat Sheet Premium by visiting here:

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/newsletter/

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)




Posted in Buzz, Featured, The Edge, The Trade0 Comments

Tax Season: Which Companies Will Win?

Tax Season: Which Companies Will Win?

The Trading Edge with Derek HoffmanIn case you were distracted by Ben Bernanke’s testimony last week, an interesting trend in consumer behavior is taking shape during this year’s tax-filing season.

Based on news from the top tax service companies, you will see individuals are in a very cost conscious state-of-mind. Consumers are quickly selecting the cheaper of the two options: preparing your own tax forms.

In this week’s Edge, we look at H&R Block, Intuit, as well as a quick snapshot of Jackson Hewitt.

H&R Block (HRB): $17.28 The “Hamburger Helper” of Tax Prep

Shares were crushed last Wednesday after the company warned they would miss their puffed up 2010 earnings outlook. H&R Block had expected fiscal 2010 earnings from continuing operations to amount to $1.60 to $1.80 a share. The consensus estimate from analysts polled by Thomson Reuters is at the low end of that range, $1.61 per share.

Past quarter earnings are due out after the bell on March 8th. The current estimate of analysts polled by Thomson Reuters is for a profit of $.16 cents per share on revenue of $959.2 million.

CEO Russ Smyth said, “We believe industry filings are down significantly due to the recession and sustained, high levels of unemployment … the weak economic conditions have also contributed to a greater shift to do-it-yourself tax preparation methods among first-half clients.”

Comment: The Kansas City-based tax services giant has prepared 6.3 percent fewer tax returns — 10.06 million — through Feb. 15 than during the same span last year (10.7 million tax returns prepared). H&R Block will just have to bear the brunt of less clients and more empty desks at their retail locations this season.

Intuit (INTU): $32.36 The Do-It-Yourself Software Provider

The maker of Turbo-Tax earned $.34 cents per share vs. $.26 cents per share in the same period a year ago. Consensus estimates were expected to be $.32 cents per share, an upside beat for Intuit.

Revenue in the most recent quarterly report increased 8%, better than analyst expectations.

President and CEO of Intuit Brad Smith said on the quarterly conference call, “We’re off to a good start and we’re on track to deliver better than expected revenue and earnings growth for fiscal year 2010.”

Sales of best-in-class TurboTax products jumped 11%. Intuit reported selling 10.97 million TurboTax products compared to 9.9 million in the same period a year ago. The web-based version of the product saw a 23% gain in sales, a sign that online tax preparation is leading the way this season.

Comment: Management recently raised full-year guidance estimates for revenue and profits. Also, It’s important to note that Director David Batchelder purchased a sizable insider stake of over 12.5 million shares on December 15, 2009 when the stock was around $30 per share — only slightly lower than today’s price of $32.36 per share. Initial signs show Intuit with a strong start in capturing the demand for do-it-yourself tax prep.

Jackson Hewitt (JTX): $2.44 The Franchise with Ugly Financials

Fiscal 2010 3rd Quarter earnings results are scheduled for March 11, 2010.

Comment: JTX is quickly burning cash. The company has only $60K in cash remaining relative to $311 million in debt obligations. I would steer clear of this company until the financials improve; otherwise, you might get caught holding the bag as this company files for bankruptcy in the near future or becomes a penny stock.

Among the three tax preparation players highlighted above, Intuit is definitely the safest trend play, while H&R Block and Jackson Hewitt are the contrarian higher-risk pullback plays. Jackson Hewitt is definitely the weakest of the three companies, but still possesses a recognized brand name in the marketplace. Consumers do not mind the hold-your-hand service when they have the extra cushion. However, companies like H&R Block are coming to realize the cushion is either minimal or non-existent for most individuals filing taxes this year.

Disclosure: No positions in the companies mentioned.

To get entry points, stop-loss points, and profit targets for our watch list stocks and Featured Trade, simply try a 14-day complimentary trial to Wall St. Cheat Sheet Premium by visiting here:

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/newsletter/

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)




Posted in Buzz, Featured, The Edge, The Trade1 Comment

What Do Shutter Island and Jersey Shore Have in Common? Viacom.

What Do Shutter Island and Jersey Shore Have in Common? Viacom.

The Trading Edge with Derek HoffmanWhat do Leonardo DiCaprio, Steven Colbert, ‘Snooki,’ John Stewart, ICarly, ‘The Situation’ and Tom Cruise all have in common? They are all entertainers delivering eye-catching content under the Viacom Inc. (ticker: VIA-B) umbrella.

With more people at home (i.e. less people working), the entertainment content business is seeing a resurgence. Viacom’s Paramount Pictures recently released a Martin Scorsese thriller last weekend, “Shutter Island,” starring Leonardo DiCaprio. The movie delivered the best weekend debut ever for both the director and star actor, opening with $41.1 million in revenues.

In its most recent quarterly report, Viacom’s profit quadrupled year-over-year, surpassing Wall Street consensus estimates. Viacom Inc. earned $1.14 per share vs. $0.28 cents per share in the same quarter a year ago. Chief Executive Philippe Dauman recently said, “We do see growing signs of strength … the tone is clearly more positive.”

Viacom Inc. was receiving plenty of flack for the fledgling ratings at MTV until hit show ‘Jersey Shore’ came along. Ratings at MTV increased 20% in the first five weeks of 2010. Additionally, worldwide home entertainment revenue climbed 12% on robust DVD and Blu-ray sales of such titles as “Star Trek” and “Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen.”

On a philanthropic note, Diddy, Queen Latifah, and Pharrell took the stage recently hosting a two-hour concert and telethon to benefit earthquake relief efforts in Haiti, titled “SOS Saving OurSelves — Help for Haiti” on Viacom’s BET, MTV and VH1.

After a short-lived separation, Tom Cruise re-unites with Viacom’s Paramount for Mission Impossible IV, a guaranteed blockbuster slated for release in 2011. So, continue to stay tuned to the star-studded and action-packed reality show called Viacom.

Disclosure: No positions in the VIA.

To see our Featured Trade in February’s Premium Newsletter, get your feet wet with a 14-day complimentary trial by visiting here:

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/newsletter/

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)




Posted in Featured, The Edge, The Trade0 Comments

20 Failed Banks of 2010

20 Failed Banks of 2010

On Friday evening, the Associate Press released yet another story about banks failure. It reminds me of the end of ‘08 all over again. Obviously these failures are on a smaller scale, but we have the same pattern of bank failures being announced on Friday nights when everyone is away from the desk and thinking about a fun-filled weekend.

The number of bank failures in 2010 climbed 25% last week, trailing the failure total of 25 in ‘08 by 5 banks and bringing the overall total to 185 bank failures since the crumbling began in at the start of 2008.

The 20 Bank Failures of 2010

This past week:

#20: La Jolla Bank FSB in La Jolla, CA: 10 branches, $3.6 billion in assets and $2.8 billion in deposits.

#19: George Washington Savings Bank in Orlando Park, Ill.: 4 branches, $412.8 million in assets and $397 million in deposits.

#18: Marco Community Bank in Marco Island, FL: 1 branch, $119.6 million in assets and $117.1 million in deports

#17: La Coste National Bank in La Coste, TX: 1 branch, $53.9 million in assets and $49.3 million in deposits.

The other February Bank Failure:

#16: 1st American State Bank of Minnesota in Hancock, MN: $18.2 million in assets and $16.3 million in deposits

The January Bank Failures:

#15 American Marine Bank in Bainbridge, WA: $373.2 million in assets and $308.5 million in deposits

#14: First Regional Bank in Los Angeles, CA: $2.18 billion in assets and $1.87 billion in deposits

#13: Community Bank and Trust in Cornelia, GA: $1.21 billion in assets and $1.11 billion in deposits

#12: Marshall Bank in Hallock, MN: $59.9 million in assets and $54.7 million in deposits

#11: Florida Community Bank in Immokalee, FL: 11 branches, $875.5 million in assets and $774.6 million in deposits

#10: First National Bank of Georgia in Carrolton, GA: $832.6 million in assets and $757.9 million in deposits

#9: Columbia River Bank in The Dalles, OR: $1.1 billion in assets and $1.0 billion in deposits

#8: Evergreen Bank in Seattle, WA: $488.5 million in assets and $439.4 million in deposits

#7: Charter Bank in Santa Fe, NM: $1.2 billion in assets and $851.5 million in deposits

#6: Bank of Leeton in Leeton, MO: $20.1 million in assets and $20.4 million in deposits

#5: Premier American Bank in Miami, FL: $350.9 million in assets and $326.3 million in deposits.

#4: Barnes Banking Company in Kaysville, UT: $827.8 million in assets and $786.5 million in deposits.

#3: St. Stephen State Bank in St. Stephen, MN: 1 branch, $24.7 million in assets and $23.4 million in deposits

#2: Town Community Bank and Trust in Antioch, Ill.: $69.6 million in assets and $67.4 million in deposits.

#1: Horizon Bank in Bellingham, WA: $1.3 billion in assets

Last year, the federal deposit insurance fund fell into the red. The FDIC expects the cost of resolving failed banks to grow to about $100 billion over the next four years.

To stay ahead of curve, get your feet wet with a 14-day complimentary trial of our Premium Services by visiting here:

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/premium/

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)




Posted in Buzz, Featured, Most Popular, The Edge, The Trade0 Comments

The Edge: Two Olympic Investments in Canada

The Edge: Two Olympic Investments in Canada

The Trading Edge with Derek HoffmanOne of your favorite posts was when I covered Brazil in “Bright Signs of an Early Carnival for Traders Utilizing Brazilian ETFs“. So, with the Winter Olympics in full-throttle I want to shine the light on some safe and steady Canadian investments.

As of this morning, the U.S., Germany and France lead the Olympics with the most medals per country, respectively. Meanwhile, this year’s Olympics host, Canada, is tied for 4th place. Canada may not be placing first in the Olympics, but they are economically benefiting from the attention on Vancouver and the wallets being opened in surrounding areas right now.

iShares MSCI Canada Index ETF (EWC): The case of higher lows

EWC is an exchange traded fund that allows you to invest in a diversity of Canadian holdings. Companies such as Royal Bank of Canada (RY), Suncor Energy (SU), Barrick Gold (ABX), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), fertilizer leader Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT) and Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) are just a sampling of strong large-cap companies moving the needle for EWC. Financials, energy and industrial materials make up the majority sector weighting in EWC, and all stand to gain from the Olympics currently in Canada.

The Canadian Dollar (FXC): An anti-dollar hedge

If you are concerned about Bernanke’s printing presses spinning galore at zero interest policy and flushing the market with more and more U.S. dollars, then look no further than the Canadian Dollar. Consider the Rydex CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar Trust, or FXC. If you think a currency is representative of a country’s share price, then this curreny-based ETF (FXC) is a simple way to play the Canadian dollar. The Canadian banking system has been rather healthy in comparison to other countries across the globe. Further, the country’s debt to GDP ratio has remained stable and commodities continue to perform and drive upside for FXC.

In the words of highly respected chief economist and native Canadian David Rosenberg, “We’re still in this post-bubble rollercoaster ride and the theme for 2010 will be the return of volatility … focus on high quality companies with dividend yield … global economic growth is going to be disappointing over the next 4-6 quarters.”

Stay warm and stay nimble. Continue to enjoy the Olympics, where each country all over world showcases their athletic prowess on the center stage in Vancouver, Canada.

Disclosure: No positions in the stocks mentioned.

To see our Featured Trade in February’s Premium Newsletter, get your feet wet with a 14-day complimentary trial by visiting here:

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/newsletter/

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)




Posted in Buzz, Featured, Most Popular, The Edge, The Trade0 Comments

The Edge: Battle of the Beverage Behemoths Coke vs. Pepsi

The Edge: Battle of the Beverage Behemoths Coke vs. Pepsi

The Trading Edge with Derek Hoffman2010 is in the red, more people watched the Super Bowl than ever before (i.e. unemployment still must be high), the Saints finished with a story book ending to the post-Katrina rollercoaster that New Orleans faced, and the DOW recently cracked below 10,000 for the 1st time in 3 months.

Today, I’m going to dig a little deeper into the Battle of the Beverage Behemoths: Coke (KO) vs. Pepsi (PEP):

Coca-Cola (KO): Still the Real Thing

Earnings: $.66 cents per share compared to $.43 cents per share in the same period a year ago. The consensus analyst estimate was $.66 per share, in-line with expectations.

Revenue increased 5.6% to $7.5 billion from $7.1 billion. Analysts expected revenue of $7.2 billion, an upside surprise for KO.

On the conference call, CEO Muhtar Kent said, “”Compared to this time last year, there’s a lot more clarity in terms of what the consumer is seeing. Not all good, but there’s a lot more clarity.”

Comment: Coca-Cola said it gained market share globally in the non-alcoholic ready-to-drink beverage category for the 10th straight quarter. KO sold 5% more beverages worldwide in its 4th quarter, with stronger sales in China and India. North America saw a 1% decline in case volume, an evident sign the U.S. consumer is still less willing to spend than once before. Coca-Cola is focused on its international growth, as international sales now consist of 75% of total company revenue. KO seems more focused on ‘opening happiness’ in other parts of the world, since North American happiness has experienced a plateau over the past couple years.

PepsiCo (PEP): Super Bowl Dorito Domination

Earnings: $.90 cents per share compared to $.46 cents per share in the same period a year ago. The consensus analyst estimate was $.91 per share, a minor expectation miss for PEP.

Net revenue increased 4.5% to $13.3 billion from $12.7 billion. PepsiCo positively nudged analyst expectations of $13.26 billion.

Comment: The true winner of cheers and laughter during the Super Bowl commercial showdown clearly goes to ‘Keep Yo Hands off my Momma and my Doritos.’ The post-game commercial buzz is still lingering the Doritos commercial, and the sign of a true win for PEP’s Super Bowl investment. Today’s quarterly earnings release proved PepsiCo’s snacks business to be a major catalyst for growth. Like Coca-Cola, the reiterated theme from PEP management was a focus on accelerating growth in developing, overseas markets since PepsiCo’s North American beverage revenue also declined. On a bright note, PepsiCo forecasted an 11-13% growth rate for core constant currency Earnings per Share for fiscal 2010. As PepsiCo hopes to complete the $7.8 billion acquisition of its two largest bottlers by the end of the month, patience will pay you with more clarity into PEP’s future numbers.

The markets are displaying heavy volume down days, an ominous sign that the recent ‘Great Recession’ bear market rally is no longer dancing, but wobbling with shaky legs. Capital preservation is never a losing a proposition during turbulent times like these.

Coke (KO) or Pepsi (PEP)? Who do you think won the battle of Super Bowl Ads?

Disclosure: No positions in the stocks mentioned.

To see our Featured Trade in February’s Premium Newsletter, get your feet wet with a 14-day complimentary trial by visiting here:

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/newsletter/

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)




Posted in Featured, The Edge, The Trade2 Comments

Advert

Share Your Thoughts

Did Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke convince you the Fed is doing a great job without any help?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...